Salomon FellCross Shoe Review

Update (Jul.23.12) at bottom of post…

Review Summary:

  • Light, low drop, responsive, and fast trail running shoe
  • Aggressive tread designed to perform well in soft, muddy ground.  Especially good on technical, twisty trails
  • Minimal sole padding, so if you don’t like feeling what is underfoot this might not be the shoe for you
  • Snug fit – definitely try them on before buying to make sure you get the right size
  • Soft lugs wouldn’t be a good choice if your running plans include a significant amount of time on asphalt – try another shoe for this
  • Mine seemed to get better the more I ran in them – I recommend a few shorter runs to ‘break’ them in

Full Review
I have been looking forward to trying out the Salomon FellCross shoes since I first read about them.  I tried a pair of SpeedCross 2 this past winter (click here for that review) and it sounded like the FellCross would be similar, only lighter and with a lower drop – just what I was looking for.  I have now had the opportunity to get out a number of times with these shoes and wanted to give my initial thoughts.

Right out of the box these shoes seem fast.  They look super aggressive and I liked the red/black color.  What struck me first was how light they felt for such a substantial, robust looking shoe.

Fresh out of the box

To begin with, I’ve never knowingly encountered a “fell” but through extensive research have learned that they are hills/mountains in Britain.  These shoes were designed for fell racing – running up said hills/mountains.  While we don’t have fells around here, we definitely have a lot of hills so I hoped the design would transfer well for my needs.

Dragging my FellCross’ up a Niagara ‘fell’!

My first impression of running in these shoes was that they felt really fast and agile on my feet.  I am used to running in low-drop road shoes so I immediately liked how they worked with my stride.  They were also really supportive around my ankle and gave me confidence on the rough sections of trail.

The Salomon FellCross has a very aggressive outsole tread pattern – similar to the SpeedCross shoes.  It is basically made up of triangle shaped lugs (slightly smaller on the FellCross than on the SpeedCross).  The lugs were obviously designed to bite into mud and soft ground, but I didn’t find them problematic on all the hard packed ground that I tested them out on.  The sole is made of a soft, grippy rubber that tends to hold onto hard, dry surfaces.  I haven’t used them enough to weigh in on the durability of the sole but I would safely guess that a lot of asphalt use would burn down the lugs quite quickly.  They performed fine on asphalt, but in terms of durability I would say they are definitely a trail only shoe.

Aggressive lugs on the sole

The FellCross shoes had much thinner padding than other trail shoes I have run in.  They are measured as having a heel height of 20mm and toe height of 16mm (including the lugs at ~7mm).  With this minimal padding between the foot and the sole I noticed a greatly increased sensation of what was underfoot compared to a lot of trail shoes – I really liked this.  This gave me a better sensitivity to the nuances of the ground I was running on.  Where this was really evident was on a 1/2km downhill section of gravel road where I could feel individual rocks as I stepped on them.  As I said, I like this sensory foot feedback but some might not, so be aware of it if you are considering these shoes.

Nice low drop, and not much padding

Difference in heel stack height between the FellCross and SpeedCross2 shoe

The upper on this shoe was very robust.  The fabric keeps dirt/debris from getting in the shoe and is advertised as being designed to not absorb water for running in wet conditions.  One thing I really liked on the FellCross upper was the soft middle part of the upper heel cup.  It was nice and flexible and I never experienced any rubbing in my achilles tendon area no matter how steep the trail got.  I thought this was a smart feature for these shoes.  I managed to test the upper with a spectacular crash after stupidly tripping on an exposed root during a moment of inattention.  The shoe that took the brunt of the impact had no issues at all (while my knees, back, and ego had significant damage!)

Heel cup with soft (black section) upper middle area

The fit of these shoes was deceiving for me.  I have worn size 10’s in all of my Salomon footwear so naturally had these in a 10.  When I first put them on, the toe box area seemed quite snug.  It wasn’t an uncomfortable tightness, just a feeling that the shoe was really hugging my forefoot.  I wondered how this would feel after running in them for a while, and thought maybe I should have tried a larger size.  I was pleasantly surprised that despite my concerns, the toebox fit was great every time I used them.  They felt very supportive and almost like a hard sock forming around my foot.

Toe area – very well protected and lugged for climbing grip

I did experience issues with the heel cup on one of the shoes, however I think this was mainly due to my own feet, and not getting the sock/lace tension right the first time I used them.  I have had similar issues with the same heel during first runs in other trail shoes with a rigid heel cup.  My first run in these shoes was an 18 km recovery run on some hardpacked, hilly trails.  I started feeling my heel rubbing about the 10 km point and tried making some adjustments.  It was too late at this point and I ended up with a huge blister on my heel.  On subsequent runs I managed to get the lace tension right, and tried a thicker pair of socks which seems to have solved the issue (hard to tell because the blister is still sensitive).  I would suggest (and with new shoes in the future, I will be) taking them out for a shorter run to get everything dialed in before heading out for the first long run.  Similar to what I found on my SpeedCross 2’s, I struggled with getting the lace tension where I wanted it with the Salomon laces.  I definitely prefer an elastic type of speed lace versus these static cord laces.  One improvement I found with the laces on the FellCross is a much smaller plastic tensioner.  It is easier to stow away once you get them strapped on.

All in all these shoes are really growing on me.  I have worn them for 20km moderate paced runs down to 6km sprint trail races and they have performed great.  Even though they seem designed for wetter conditions, I haven’t had any problems with them on our dry trails this summer.  Now that I have sorted out the heel rubbing issue by changing socks and lace tension I am really liking them.  Hopefully we’ll get some rain soon and I can update my report with their mud performance!

Thanks for reading and if I have missed anything, feel free to comment or contact me on twitter @runbikeraceblog.

July 23, 2012 Update

I have been using these shoes as my go-to trail shoe for a couple of weeks and wanted to add an update now that I have run just over 125km in them.  They are holding up very well – no durability issues at all.  The lugs aren’t wearing out even though all I have used them on is dry, hard-packed trails.  The blister issue I had experienced on the first run hasn’t recurred and the shoes seem more comfortable every time I wear them.  I’m still happy with them and would definitely recommend giving them a try.

A little dustier, but no wear issues

Advertisements

18 responses to “Salomon FellCross Shoe Review

  1. Thanks for the review. I’m ready to replace my SpeedCross shoes with something that has less of a heel. The FellCross is high on my list. Can you tell me if the FellCross has the same pocket at the top of the tongue to hold the ends of the laces?

    Thanks again.

  2. i have a pair or speedcross 3 and inov-8 bargrip. the innov-8 have a 0mm cushioning and only 3mm of rubber between your foot and the floor (not including lugs) i found that when running on trails in the inov-8’s not only would i be feeling the individual rocks beneath my feet but they would sometimes be painful. using the speedcross 3 i havnt felt this as its more rugged and i like this, but i love the feeling of barefoot running… only without the pain that the inov-8’s cause me. will the fellcross take both elements and combine them? id like a ruggged tough shoe with a bare foot feel but i dont want the pain of standing on angular sharp rocks on some trails. do the fellcross cause pain on tough trails or do they simply offer a bare foot running feel? thanks for the help

    • Hey Tobias thanks for reading. I’ve never tried the inov8’s so can’t directly compare. The fellcross do have much less forefoot padding than the speedcross so compared to them you feel much more of the ground surface. Personally I really like the feel – you can feel an individual rock but the rubber on the sole is thick and hard enough that I don’t feel like the pointy sharp rocks are able to bruise or hurt my foot. I’ve never had an issue with this so far.

      Hope you get a chance to try them out. I’m still loving mine.

    • I haven’t run in a pair of Inov-8’s either. I looked up the Bare Grip 200 and didn’t see a rock plate as one of the features. Inov-8’s website does not recommend the shoe for hard surfaces. They rate the Bare Grip higher for soft and loose surfaces. Running rocks without a rock plate is only for those who’ve toughened up their feet to the point where they could run rocks barefoot, in my opinion. I don’t believe the FellCross has a rock plate either. I’ve been running rocky trails in the New Balance MT110 for about six months now. The MT110 has a thin rock rock plate that helps protect a runner’s foot from small and medium-sized rocks. It’s a tricky balance, however. Shoes with more protection give you less trail feel. Shoes with less protection give you more pain … until your feet toughen up.

      I’ve had my FellCrosses out for a couple runs on snow-covered trails (not much of a problem with rocks – they’re all covered in snow pack. The traction is excellent as is the FellCross’ ability to keep snow out of the shoe. In deeper snow, a pair of gaiters would be a good addition, but the shoe itself does a good job of keeping snow out – or at least much better than my MT110’s.

  3. Great review. When you mentioned that they needed a few runs to break-in, it reminded me that I had that same thought when I first got them – had totally forgotten about that. They just seemed more stable and responsive after about 30 KM on them.

    In my opinion, the best aspect of these shoes is the upper. They just wrap around the foot and hold it snug from top to bottom. I tried them on about 4 months before I finally bought them, and I never forgot that feeling. The trick for me is to pull the laces snug, hold with with one hand and then pull the laces down by the toes a little more for an even tension.

    These are great for winter – especially when paired with a gaiters. While surely not as insulated from cold and wet like the ClimaShield version of the Speedcrosses, they are quite impervious. I find that they get quite hot (and, may feet sweat a lot), so most of the moisture I get inside the shoe is sweat from my feet.

    Agreed – highly recommend these shoes for anyone looking for a very solid shoe in the low-drop category.

  4. Thanks for the detail review. Been thinking of getting the Fellcross for the Ultra Trail Mt Fuji (April)… Terrain wise, looks suitable. However, I’ve been running very comfortable in the Sense and Sense Ultra (without the need for socks) – but I also understand that Sense may not be so suitable for the UTMF terrain. Have you ever run or do you even think the Fellcross can go SockLESS?

    • Thanks for reading and for your question.

      I’m not a sockless runner but I had a look at my fellcrosses to see if they seemed suitable. There are 2 major seams across the shoe – 1 behind the toes, 1 on each side in the midfoot. This might cause an issue in bare feet, but I suppose it depends on your feet. The inner fabric itself is nice and smooth.

      Let me know if I can help with anything else.

  5. Hey.. Thanks for the quick response. I noticed them as well… guess the only way to find out is to get a pair and take them out for a couple of hours of long run. 🙂

    • Yeah that’s the only real way to know. By the way, I had them on again tonight and realized that the toe box seam is actually where the tongue attaches, so just across the top of the foot.

      Ill be interested to know what you think of them. Have a great UTMF!

  6. Pingback: Salomon Speedcross 3 Shoe Review | runbikerace·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s